TMCnet News

Fitch Affirms Lake Zurich CUSD #95, IL GOs at 'AA+'; Outlook Stable
[September 28, 2016]

Fitch Affirms Lake Zurich CUSD #95, IL GOs at 'AA+'; Outlook Stable


Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following Lake Zurich Community Unit School District, IL (the district) ratings at 'AA+':

--$27.3 million school building GO bonds, series 2000B;

--Issuer Default Rating (IDR).

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are supported by the county's full faith and credit and ad valorem taxing power, without limitation as to rate or amount.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The 'AA+' rating considers the district's slow revenue growth prospects, solid expenditure flexibility, low long-term liability burden and strong gap closing capacity during times of economic downturn.

Economic Resource Base

The district is located in Lake County, 37 miles northwest of downtown Chicago, with a 2014 population of 31,054. The district serves primary and secondary students of the affluent communities of Lake Zurich, Deer Park, Hawthorn Woods, Kildeer and North Barrington.

Revenue Framework: 'bbb' factor assessment

Fitch expects the natural pace of revenue growth to keep pace with the level of inflation. Like many U.S. school districts, the district has minimal independent legal ability to raise revenues.

Expenditure Framework: 'aa' factor assessment

Fitch expects the district's natural pace of spending growth to be above the expected pace of revenue growth. Carrying costs are low and the management has identified some additional expenditure flexibility.

Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aaa' factor assessment

The long -term liability burden, including overall debt and direct pension liabilities, is low relative to district personal income.

Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment

The district has exceptionally strong gap closing capacity given solid expenditure flexibility and moderate revenue volatility. Management has shown the ability to rapidly rebuild financial flexibility during times of recovery.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Sustained Reduction in Enrollment: The district is susceptible to meaningful reductions in state revenues should enrollment decline significantly.

CREDIT PROFILE

The district's tax base has declined approximately 15% since its peak in fiscal 2010. However, taxable values began to stabilize in fiscal 2015 with modest growth of 1%. The county assessor expects that TAV will continue to grow in 2016 and conservatively estimates increases in line with inflation.

Enrollment has declined by a sizable 14% over the past 10 years, to 5,673 in 2015-16, which prompted the closure of a school in fiscal 2010. This decline has been inconsistent with a relatively stable population (0.2% growth between census 2000 and 2010) and is attributable to small incoming kindergarten classes. More recently, 10 new students (0.17%) were added in the current 2016-2017 school year but Fitch believes that district may still be vulnerable to enrollment decline risk.

Revenue Framework

Property taxes comprise 65% of general fund revenues, while intergovernmental revenues are equal to a modest 7% of general fund revenue.

Ad-valorem revenues are expected to grow at the rate of inflation, absent management action, due to increases in assessed value (AV) occurring at a similar rate. Taking policy action into account, Fitch expects that tax revenues are likely to grow at a rate marginally above that of inflation due to management's history of raising the property tax levy on an annual basis, within state tax cap limitations.

State aid is expected to decline, as recent enrollment losses have been considerable. Despite these declines, per-pupil funding is a modest $374 per pupil; therefore Fitch believes the financial impact of further declines, unless they accelerate, is likely to be manageable.

Independent legal ability to raise revenues is limited. The general fund property tax levy is limited by the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law to the lesser of 5% or the rate of inflation, plus new construction.

Charges for fees and services may be legally raised without limitation but do not represent a meaningful percent of spending.

Expenditure Framework

The district allocates 52% of general fund spending to student instruction related expenses..

The natural pace of spending growth is expected to be above expected natural revenue growth, given expectations for the district's revenue stream and the nature of its spending obligations.

Expenditure growth is largely driven by labor force salary increases and employee benefits costs. The district is currently in the first year of a three-year contract which stipulates salary increases of 4% in year one, 3.25% in year two, and 2.5% in year three.

Carrying costs for pension, other post-employment benefits (OPEB) and debt service is equal to 8.7% of governmental spending. Expectations for declining debt service costs will likely reduce carrying cost levels over the next 10 years. The state of Illinois pays for the bulk of teacher pension costs, reducing what might otherwise be a substantial fixed cost burden.

The district carefully manages expenditures and has identified cost savings equal to approximately 4% of general fund expenditures. Areas of expenditure reduction include pay-go capital, staff reductions, and other areas of discretionary spending.

Long-Term Liability Burden

The long-term liability burden is low relative to the resource base. The net pension liability plus overall debt represents 5% of personal income. Overlapping debt accounts for approximately 60% of the long-term liability burden, with direct debt accounting for 35% of the liability. Amortization of direct debt is rapid with 100% of debt scheduled for retirement in 10 years. While the district intends to issue new debt in the future, Fitch anticipates that the long-term liabilit burden will remain low.



The district participates in The district participates in the Teacher's Retirement System of the State of Illinois (TRS), contributions to which are currently made on behalf of the district by the state, and the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF). The state records the majority of the teacher's pension liability on its balance sheet, with only a small portion accruing to the district. The combined plans report an assets-to-liabilities ratio of 82.5% when using a 7.5% rate of return, and 78.2% when using Fitch's more conservative 7% discount rate as of Dec. 31, 2014. The district also participates in the state-run retiree health care plan, making a minimal $273,000 payment (0.34% of spending) in fiscal 2014.

Operating Performance


Financial performance has remained positive despite regular use of general fund resources for pay-go capital spending during the great recession, which reduced robust reserves during a period of limited revenue growth under the state's tax levy cap. The district's ample reserves provide superior gap-closing ability given its solid ability to cut expenditures and moderate expected revenue volatility, consistent with a 'aaa' financial resilience assessment.

Conservative budgeting has preserved strong operating margins with additions to fund balance in each of the last eight fiscal years. Management has plans to use unrestricted fund balance for routine pay-go capital but is committed to maintaining reserves within their 25% fund balance policy. Fitch believes that the district has demonstrated a willingness to increase financial flexibility during times of recovery and has the ability to rapidly rebuild reserves if needed.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.

Applicable Criteria

U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/879478

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1012331

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1012331

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/jsp/creditdesk/PolicyRegulation.faces?context=2&detail=31

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON (News - Alert) THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001


[ Back To TMCnet.com's Homepage ]